The health convergence initiative began in May 2012 with the establishment of the Health Convergence Core Group (HCCG), consisting now of nine ethnic health organizations (EHOs) and community based health organizations (CBHOs):
Two key partners with the HCCG in convergence are the Health Information System Working Group (HISWG) and the Ethnic Health System Strengthening Group (EHSSG).
The HISWG was established in 2002 and complements convergence coordination, cooperation, and alignment through the provision of key data, analysis, and reports about the ethnic health system to support planning and decision making.
The EHSSG emerged in 2015 and its activities also complement convergence coordination, cooperation, and alignment through the enhancement of the key building blocks of the ethnic health system:
All three of these organizations support the ethnic health system which has been providing healthcare services to the ethnic people in Burma and migrants/refugees in Thailand for thirty years. This system is vast in its scope and size:
Furthermore in understanding convergence, it is important to note that while health is not political, health convergence is political because:
The Burma Government views the EHOs/CBHOs, in a reformed Burma health sector, as integrated into the deconcentrated Union health system of the Burma Government or a separate healthcare service provider with delegated services provision responsibilities. In stark contrast, the EHOs/CBHOs do not agree that health convergence is integration into a Burma Government centralized, deconcentrated, or delegated health system, but is the creation of a new devolved health system of a Federal Union of Myanmar. In this latter respect, the following chart matrix presents a possible devolved health system authority/responsibility model, for illustration purposes, toward which the health systems of the Burma Government and the EHOs/CBHOs could converge under a Federal Union of Burma:
Health System Authority & Responsibilities |
Level of Government |
||
Union |
State/Region |
Township |
|
Setting norms, standards, & regulations | X | ||
Policy formulation | X | X | |
Revenue generation/resource allocation | X | X | |
Data collection, processing, & analysis | X | X |
X |
Program/project design | X | ||
Budgeting/expenditure authority | X |
X |
|
Purchasing/warehousing drugs/supplies | X |
X |
|
Monitoring/oversight of hospital/health facilities | X | ||
Hospitals & health facilities management | X |
X |
|
Facilities & infrastructures | X | ||
Training & staffing (planning, hiring, & firing) | X |
X |
|
Salaries & benefits | X | ||
Contracting hospitals | X |
Moreover with Universal Health Coverage (UHC), the EHOs/CBHOs agree on the UHC concept, a basic essential package of health services (EPHS), importance of data sharing to inform health planning, and the inability of the Burma Government to implement UHC by itself, especially in the ethnic service areas. Yet, the EHOs/CBHOs do not agree that political decision making, administrative control, and pooling/purchasing for UHC and the health sector in general should be at the Union level; only overall UHC/health sector policy making may be at the Union level in consultation with the state/region governments. Otherwise, primary health authority and responsibility should be at the state/region level. Thus as with the two parallel health systems, there are two different roads to the same destination of UHC.
Key current health convergence issues are:
– The two 21st Century Panglong Union Peace Conferences, Step Three of the Burma Government’s Seven Step Roadmap, has yet to produce meaningful results toward peace and national reconciliation.
– The Burma Army continues use force to bring about peace with the ethnic people with active fighting in Kachin, Shan, Arakan, and Chin States.
– Some major international donors have withdrawn/reduced financial support from the EHOs/CBHOs to work with the Burma Government by funding and implementing Burma Government-approved health programs.
– EHOs/CBHOs are not officially registered in Burma.
– Imprisonment for those who meet or aid such illegal organizations and an impediment to collaborations between official bodies in Burma and the EHOs/CBHOs.
– Restricts funding opportunities for many EHOs/CBHOs.
– But, registration reporting requirements may endanger ethnic health workers.
– EHOS/CBHOs are not recognized as health organizations by the Burma government and subject to violations of the medical regulations/ laws of Burma.
– Health workers of the EHOs/CBHOs are not accredited as health workers by the Burma government and subject to arrest/detention.
In conclusion, the following about health convergence are important: